Some theorize Epstein Was killed, others believe he committed suicide, however Checkout Zuckerberg Island Kids!
So let me start by clarifying that is total sarcasm, and that I wouldn't let any child of mine onto facebook, let alone near Mark Zuckerberg.
Additionally, Hawaiian locals such as Shannon Buckner certainly got the short end of the bargain for Zuckerberg's Island.
But hey, you can't judge a guy for owning island property even if he brutalized some Native islanders with shrewd litigation tactics right?
Whether or not you believe so, owners of islands don't have the best track record. The first example that naturally comes to mind is Jeffrey Edward Epstein. For those unaware, Epstein is a known billionaire pedophile that catored to the elite by providing young girls his affiliates obducted through human trafficking.
Furthermore, whether CEO Mark Zuckerberg directly aids human trafficking and pedophilia, it is rampant on his platform!
One might say, "Wow Sean! A most audacious accusation to be throwing old boys way!" Good Sir/Madam, you haven't seen anything yet! 😈
That's because of a number of different reasons. Old boy certainly has had quite a bit of hype and controversy in regards to his platform being plagued by pedophiles for certain!
Facebook's a social platform self proclaimed to be a "Family Environment" that's used by 2.45 billion users. As a result of the total lack of regard to user data privacy, it is a den of child molesters.
So if you came upon this article in Google search, naturally your expectations of relevance aren't very high. Or at least they shouldn't be, because they've openly admited to manipulating their search results for monetary gain and political interest on countless occasions. 🤗
With News Headlines of Epstein's Pedophile Island, talk of Zuckerberg owning island property brings concern. The first thing we came to find, is despite being initially mislead, Mark doesn't actually own an entire island.
This comes as a relief as neighbors would definitely serve to detour abducting sex slaves. So we wont be able to Checkout Zuckerberg Island Kids, at least not right away!
Probably until big man Facebook CEO rounds up all the islanders and has them removed with litigation.😈 The billionaire isn't known for his minimalist views and usage of resources, that's for sure. You'd think with a 59 million dollar San Francisco home, and 2 properties in lake tahoe, He'd have consumed enough space and resources.
But seriously man, it's not the Zuck man's fault there are so many people stupid enough to give him their money. I mean why wouldn't he kick out a village of people, lowballing them for pennies on the dollar with sheisty litigation? *Cough* Scumbag *Cough*
Regardless of whether or not Zuckerberg immediately promotes pedophile presence on Facebook, they're certainly abundant on the platform!
So the first thing you'll notice when comparing the two Island properties is that Zuckerberg's isn't an isolate island. The properties are 6022.96 Miles apart, Zuckerberg's 325 Acres is in Kauai, Hawaii, and Epstein's is in the British Virgin Islands.
|Little Saint James Island||$63,874,223||18.299501||-64.8271701|
|Kahu'Aina Holdings LLC||$35,237,400||22.204254||-159.349590|
So the first piece of evidence came from an Occulis employee named Dov Katz. As you may be already well aware, Facebook owns holdings in quite a number of other companies.
Some other very popular platforms would be WhatsApp, and Instagram. Additionally, Facebook owns 77 other holdings according to wikipedia
Apparently old boy had the day off and decided to purchase some side action with that fat salary pay.
Naturally, the everyday occurence of hiring prostitutes isn't really seen as morally wrong by most.
despite prostitution being a criminal offense in most states, modern ones like Nevada have decriminalized it. However, what transpired in their conversation went down a more darker path than merely sex solicitation.
Undercover: "Can I be Honest with you? I'm new to all this and a little younger then my ad says but I promise u won't be dissapointed."
Katz: "How much younger?"
Undercover: "15...I'm sending my pic. Just don't say anything ok?"
Katz: "Sure! 😃"
So is this particular situation bordering entrapment? From a judicial perspective I'd certainly say so but here's the bottom line.
The second some purported girl gives you a heads up and indicates she's a minor, you're a dirtbag if you proceed to have sex with her.
Furthermore, Facebook caters to pedophiles to the extremes of banning individuals who dare voice their opinions of convicted child molesters.
I suppose one could argue occurences such as the Tweet to the right cannot be immediately taken as a statement of fact.
Probably because lying is an ideal strategy for ranking News Authorities in Google and Facebook user feeds.
So anyone who wants to get their article to the top of Google should lie if they have half a brain right?
Fortunately, the truth is just too juicy in the instance of Mark Zuckerberg!
So, while we could have added to the stockpile of Trump Impeachment articles, we opted for the subject of an actual criminal.
Additionally, what better criminal than the one controlling the worlds communication! 🤗
as previously mentioned in our Is the Zuck Religion A Cult article, Facebook was caught with their pants down in March of 2018.
Apparently Facebook and numerous other users were asked very obsurd pro pedophile questions on a survey.
The only reason that Facebook even apologized, was due to the fact a Guardian reporter was given the survey. Additionally Facebook was forced into action because the News article ranked number one in Google for, "Facebook Pedophile." 😂
Suddenly these little fuckhead scumbags sprang into action, like they cared for the safety of their userbase's children.
They obviously don't, because if they even wanted just the perception they did, they would offer something resembling customer service.
Instead of protecting your children, Facebook pays your teenage children money to install an application that further spies on them.
Based on their track record do you think the data they obtain is properly safeguarded from pedophiles and human traffickers? That is up to you to decide!
In addition to lacking customer service by telephone, their webforms do not cover the wide range of issues.
Furthermore, outside of liability and keeping their NSA handlers happy, they don't GAF
So no need to worry little ones, you'll still be able to Checkout Zuckerberg Island Kids!
One of many questionable programs Facebook has endorsed their name with is online tutorials to aid children to program. I wonder if they use the NSA to screen the individuals passing themselves off as parents like they do their employees?
My guess would be not if it costs them money rofl! 😂 They certainly are short on staff if they cannot manage to provide voice correspondence. So why oh why, does my little eye spy, them openly accepting self proclaimed volunteer programmers?
The Houson Texas human trafficking lawsuit is the first instance in particular outright calling out Facebook for aiding and abetting pedophilia.
So while it's too soon to truly tell how the lawsuit will develop, I believe they have a case. Because just based on their track record alone, you can certainly see questionable patterns of pedophilia.
Furthermore, a quick glance at the court documents clearly illuminates to what level the 230CDA is abused by these Tech Sissies!
If you're a parent and have children, I beg you to reconsider allowing them to use the Facebook Platform. Not even Mark Zuckerberg allows his child to be exposed to his own Hellspawned website!
If my article fails in conveying the criminality of Mark Zuckerberg let me shed some light on how much of an epidemic Human trafficking is.
Just ask yourself do you want to risk your child using a platform that severly abuses 230 CDA Safe Harbor? A Company that is negligent to say the least with the security of your privacy and data?